Putting your money where your mouth is

Bob Hoffman is an example of integrity. Not only he relentlessly calls out big tech businesses on their bad behaviour, but he also has the uncanny ability to be disarmingly transparent. In his latest newsletter (scroll down to the "Mea Culpa" section), he calls himself out in front of his audience for not being able to use a newsletter service that doesn't track the recipients of his newsletter.

While some, and that would certainly include me (at least up until now), would shrug at it and say "well there is nothing I can really do about it", Bob, being a man of integrity, invites his followers who may not like to be tracked, to unsubscribe.

I find this ballsy because it means integrity is more important to bob than the health of his business and shows us how to not cut corners, as a powerful way to maintain the hard-earned trust that he's built with his following.

That's a powerful message sent through his actions, not his words. I'm personally inspired to follow his lead.

Are you?


 

If you landed here by chance or accident, don’t leave yet! We have tons of great content, such as blogs, podcasts and other forbidden experiments coming out daily. Click “>>subscribe” at the top left of this page, we’d love to have you as part of our tribe.

If you have questions about this piece, rvltr or want to chat about your strategy and communications, you can leave a comment, share with a friend, or reach us at hello{at}rvltr.studio.

Building for 400 years

Recently, I touched on the social cause embodied in the Baha'i temple of south America by Siamak Hariri.

When his firm was commissioned, he was given the mandate to build a structure that would last 400 years. While it is very likely that we will all be long dead 400 years hence, it is incredible to come across an institution that is so forward-thinking.

Building for this long a life span is nowadays incredibly complex and expensive, as buildings have become so complex and regulations so stringent, that there is a not-insignificant cost to this. It begs the question: cathedral builders did it over a thousand years ago and with great expense of human capital (a single cathedral would take hundreds of years to complete), but they built structures that were quite simple in their construction methods, albeit very innovative for the time.

These are buildings that were extremely robust because composed of simple materials assembled in straightforward ways, which explain why they very often still stand today, 1000+ years after completion.

Some are calling for a de-complexification of architecture and a return to simpler (but not simplistic), more robust construction methods.

Have we strayed so far from the path that we don't even see that the complexity we deal with is the cause of many problems? Taleb seems to think so. What do you think?

 

If you landed here by chance or accident, don’t leave yet! We have tons of great content, such as blogs, podcasts and other experiments coming out daily. Click “>>subscribe” at the top left of this page, we’d love to have you as part of our tribe.

If you have questions about this piece, rvltr or want to chat about your strategy and communications, you can leave a comment, share with a friend, or reach us at hello{at}rvltr.studio.